Social Justice Websites

Viral Site Design Offers- DIY WordPress Sites w/Hosting – No Monthly Bills – Discounted for Social Justice, Political or Social Awareness Sites. Fundraisers an Bloggers welcome.

Get Domain Name – Hosting – WordPress Design Platform for $99 Per Year.

No monthly bills – No “setup” fees – Everything you need to build your website today.

Have you ever wanted to write a blog? Ever considered your own space on the web? YourName dot com? WordPress blogs are easy to run and can get your message out. Blogs can be for profit or informational. You can use them to launch products or discuss your favorite hobby or business. Discounted for Social Justice, Political or Social Awareness Sites.

WordPress is a powerful website builder that can be used to build almost any kind of website imaginable. It is used for corporate sites, building an online store / eCommerce site, online magazines, and so much more. It is used by governments, universities, and many Fortune 500 companies.

DOMAIN: Your Name .com, .net, .org, etc. (This offer includes a name you choose, based on availability.)

HOSTING: Hosting is the actual real estate in which a website is built. A domain name is just that, a name. It needs to point to a physical space on the web known as hosting. Hosting accounts come with various features. This offer comes with unlimited traffic and unlimited storage for your site.

Included in this sale for: $99
Domain Name: (yourname .com)
Hosting: 1 year paid hosting
WordPress: Newest version – Full access
MySQL Database: Included
Traffic: Unlimited
Disk Space: Unlimited
Support: Viral Site Design

If you have any questions, please ask. After payment, the domain name selection and account setup can be completed within 2 hours of contact. Site goes live instantly if desired.

Calls Only – Free Consultation

323-739-4323

High Jacking a Movement

For those of you who follow the news, you may have heard about some recent protests. Though many of these were sparked by the death of George Floyd, it became something different in a short period of time. As the world watched in anticipation of social justice, the real masterminds went to work. Timing is everything.

Throughout history nearly every major protest has been successfully hijacked. In some cases it can be done in a subtle way. The government and media has played roles in the past of “creating the narrative” and controlling the protest. When you control the message, you control what the population sees and hears. This diminishes or re-directs the original message. The new message is intended to suit the needs of particular groups.

Other forms of hijacking are far more dangerous and some quite profitable. This latest round of civil unrest has been seized upon by the best vulchers money can buy. All of the pros came out for this one. They knew it was big and the time was now. As with many others, the hijacking was a success.

As I watched the original protests form around the death of George Floyd, I was amazed at how quickly the machine began to churn. As with many brutal deaths in the past, civil unrest and civilian protests generally follow. This was different. The outrage was too large to ignore and the crowd began to solidify. When 50% of the crowd was suburban white people, the media began to follow. This is a sad fact.

Almost instantly the movement was branded as black lives matter. This was originally a concept for the movement, not a brand or a label. That was short lived. The formal business corporation titled Black Lives Matter Global Movement, quickly attached themselves to the cause. I don’t know how much they generated “towards the cause” but this is a fact. Another “company” with a similar name, called Black Lives Matter Foundation accidentally generated over four million dollars within the first week. Employees from companies including Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Dropbox also raised over $4 million for the group. There is a lot of money in social unrest.

Worth mentioning: Susan Rosenberg has served as vice chair of the board of directors for Thousand Currents, an organization that provides fundraising and fiscal sponsorship for the Black Lives Matter Global Movement. She was an active member of revolutionary left-wing movements whose illegal activities included bombing U.S. government buildings and committing armed robberies.

Other attempts to disrupt the message were also quite successful.

One example: Three men with ties to the U.S. military and alleged to be members of an extreme white supremacist group face multiple terrorism conspiracy charges of planning to wreak havoc at protests in Las Vegas over George Floyd’s death. Federal prosecutors say the men belong to the far-right “Boogaloo” movement. The goal is to create civil unrest and provoke heavy military response to civilian disruption.

This allows their agenda to begin. How serious are they? Earlier this month, Steven Carrillo, 32, an active-duty Air Force sergeant connected to the Boogaloo movement was arrested in the May 29 fatal shooting of a federal security officer outside a U.S. courthouse in Oakland, California. He is also charged in the subsequent ambush slaying of a California sheriff’s deputy that also injured four other officers.

These groups are not alone. The mysterious person known as “Umbrella Man” — who smashed the windows of a Minneapolis auto parts store in May during the outset of George Floyd protests — has been identified as a suspected member of the Hell’s Angels who sought to stir violence and racial tensions amid the unrest. The timing was perfect. An arson investigator with the Minneapolis police wrote in the affidavit that the man’s actions on May 27 “created an atmosphere of hostility and tension” that helped inflame what had been relatively peaceful protests up to that point.

The business he vandalized was burned to the ground later the same day along with the city’s 3rd Precinct building.

The news footage simply displayed chaos, looting and arson around a civil rights protest. Of course the general public assumes it is the crazed animals that are demanding the end of police brutality. Another successful hijacking.

At least two people died in the subsequent riots, which eventually spread as far as north Minneapolis and South St. Paul, and caused roughly $500 million in damage.

The concept of outside “provocateurs” is nothing new. In the past it was more common to be associated with law enforcement. As many might recall, incidents such as the NoDAPL movement was infiltrated by law enforcement to provoke a peaceful protest to becoming violent, or at least appear as such. This tactic is commonly used to tarnish the visual perception of the group protesting and in the case of Standing Rock, it was used to authorize the use of force. “Look at the bad people we are protecting you from.”

Fact. The only weapon recovered from Standing Rock was a pistol provided by an FBI informant. #freeredfawn

So remember, the next time you see a protest, do the research to find the true message. It might be worth listening to. Also remember, the next time you are attending a protest, be sure to know the person next to you. Your freedom might depend on it.

Operation Legend – Updates

The federal government has broad power to enforce the laws of the United States, but not to police the streets or maintain order in a city if protests lead to violence.

That has been how the separation of powers between states and the federal government has been understood. The Constitution leaves the “so-called police power” in the hands of state and local officials. It is one of the “powers not delegated the United States” and instead is “reserved to the states,” as the 10th Amendment says.

This principle has been invoked often by the Supreme Court’s conservative justices. In 1995, they struck down a federal law that made it a crime to have a gun in a school zone because, as Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist said, it threatened to convert federal authority into a “general police power of the sort retained by the states.”

But President Trump says he is willing and even anxious to break down the line separating federal authority from local policing. Federal agents clad in military gear clashed repeatedly with demonstrators outside the boarded-up federal courthouse in Portland, Ore. How’s that going?

Mayor Ted Wheeler and Oregon Governor Kate Brown have called for withdrawal of the agents. Democratic members of Congress have introduced a bill to block the administration from “deploying federal forces as a shadowy paramilitary against Americans.” And mayors in other cities, including Chicago and New York, have vowed to fight any similar deployment in court.

Business owners in downtown Portland, epicenter of clashes between federal agents and protesters, have delayed reopening their shops and even considered closing them permanently since the Trump administration’s intervention worsened unrest in the city.

“The presence of federal troops has led to a near-universal upset and a worsening of conditions on the streets,” said Andrew Hoan, chief executive of Portland Business Alliance, the area’s chamber of commerce, which represents almost 1,900 businesses.

Trump’s vow to send federal agents into other cities to quell unrest and combat crime has raised questions about whether the move violates the Constitution. It has reignited a national debate on the militarization of policing. And it has added a new, disturbing twist: the use of unmarked vans in detaining protesters.